History of humans

[Trump]

I thought this was incredibly interesting.

http://www.bradshawfoundation.com/journey/

It is neat to see how the changing climate of the world affected migration and settlement patterns. I guess I never even thought all the different races of human came from the same place.

[freak]

yeah... that whole pretty little presentation they put together was all just a waist of time.... carbon dating is a complete muck up.... they found that carbon dating can only date back a certain amount of years, and after that it goes all wrong.

[雨]

waist:bored: .

[ParryDat]

Good read.

I'm interested in the future of Human's.

They say that those that don't adapt and evolve die.

If that is true,how could Human's become any more broken?We have made so many advances,and we are working on so many thing's in the future,where do we go from here?

[羽之助]

yeah... that whole pretty little presentation they put together was all just a waist of time.... carbon dating is a complete muck up.... they found that carbon dating can only date back a certain amount of years, and after that it goes all wrong.

I assume you're referring to this?

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1211/558717449_825afcceba.jpg

Well, you're right, radiocarbon (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dating) dating can only give you the approximate date of the item in question, and it can be affected by the addition of carbon from an unexpected source (like a volcano explodes or a carbon meteor falls on an early human's head). And you can only go back about 40 000 years before you're just making guesses as to the age. That makes it a complete muck-up, does it? Totally useless to the scientific community, I agree, because we all know radiocarbon dating is actually a Zionist hoax. Even the mere act of including it in a presentation based on years of tested and competing theories and archaeological evidence negates any information which might be true. Which it isn't. No sir.

[Trump]

yeah... that whole pretty little presentation they put together was all just a waist of time.... carbon dating is a complete muck up.... they found that carbon dating can only date back a certain amount of years, and after that it goes all wrong.

If you had actually read any of the information linked in the presentation (hitting the little book button) you would have read where they were comparing their theory to the dates presented by carbon dating. You would also know that they were showing the shortcomings of carbon dating and showing where puzzles pieces fit in better than the dates provided by carbone dating. Apparently for you, the presentation was a complete waste of time.

[Kusoyaro]

anyone read 'a short history of progress' from ronald wright?
about the perils of (the modern interpretation of) progress and how it is intrinsically linked to our evolution?

[Fred]

I apologize in advance for the stupid post, but I keep reading the title of the thread as “The history of humus” and I get hungry for humus.