PDA

View Full Version : OJ Simpson thrown out of resturant; lawyer claims racism


Jetsetlemming
05-13-2007, 08:07 AM
http://movies.msn.com/news/article.aspx?news=261429&

Huh, the steakhouse's liquor licence is an interesting target for a "victim of racism". Sounds like they're full of shit, personally.

Lea
05-13-2007, 08:28 AM
OJ should get over it. He did get away with murder after all. COUNT YOUR BLESSINGS!!

Civilization Phrase III
05-13-2007, 01:52 PM
OJ should get over it. He did get away with murder after all. COUNT YOUR BLESSINGS!!
Quoted for hilarity AND truth.

Roxie
05-13-2007, 03:35 PM
GEE, I'm pretty sure it wasn't racist. Why would anyone have any objection to OJ's presence? *roll eyes*

Black fist
05-13-2007, 06:54 PM
OJ before he dies needs to admit the truth and then go withered off and die somewhere away from the media.

h2orowe
05-13-2007, 07:15 PM
OJ didn't do it!



>.>

Ozero
05-13-2007, 07:20 PM
neither did MJ!!!

stsparky
05-13-2007, 08:26 PM
neither did MJ!!!
I wish for the MJ hate to cease.

PopCulturePooka
05-13-2007, 09:03 PM
I wish for the MJ hate to cease.
The little boys wanted the MJ love to cease.

But he took ages to cum.

h2orowe
05-13-2007, 09:46 PM
I wish for the MJ hate to cease.
I actually believe MJ was innocent :watson: He just had a shitty childhood, it seems. He might have mental problems or something, but I don't believe he molested kids.

Black Mage
05-13-2007, 10:29 PM
Yeah, definitely not a racism charge at all, the guy just hated to serve murderers.

Black fist
05-13-2007, 10:54 PM
I think MJ took and that there are two different carnation of MJ

King_Leonegros
05-16-2007, 02:12 AM
Hell, it probably was racist. All of you non-Blacks are oppressors keeping my people down. Damn you all.

Pierrot le Fou
05-16-2007, 02:49 AM
As stated, Michael Jackson probably has a few screws loose, but I'm not about to paint the guy a child molestor. OJ on the other hand...

koku
05-16-2007, 02:55 AM
GEE, I'm pretty sure it wasn't racist. Why would anyone have any objection to OJ's presence? *roll eyes*
I think it's 'cuz EVERYONE thought he did it got a not guilty verdict -- not 'cuz he's black.

That's prejudice for a different reason!

Azrael
05-16-2007, 03:03 AM
Am I the only one here who thinks that MJ actually is a child molestor?

Roxie
05-16-2007, 03:55 AM
I think it's 'cuz EVERYONE thought he did it got a not guilty verdict -- not 'cuz he's black.

That's prejudice for a different reason! Next time, just for you kokujin, I'll end my post with [/sarcasm]

Citizen
05-16-2007, 04:04 AM
Am I the only one here who thinks that MJ actually is a child molestor?

No, I do too.

Pierrot le Fou
05-16-2007, 04:05 AM
He could be, he couldn't be, but I'm not going to label him as one without evidence. He's openly been seen holding kids hands, and having them sit on his lap in public. The whole documentary had him stating that they slept in the same bed. If he were a child molestor, I'd think there would be a LOT more kids out there saying that of him. It seems more like extortion, taking advantage of a truly odd man.

But I don't know. Only MJ does, and he denies he's a kiddie fiddler, but would he say he was even if he were?

So we have to go on all the evidence, and the evidence points to him just being weird. Beyond that, it's inconclusive.

Citizen
05-16-2007, 04:09 AM
But I don't know. Only MJ does

Pretty sure that the kids know wether or not he is as well.

It takes two to tango and to commit sexual assault.

Pierrot le Fou
05-16-2007, 04:19 AM
Pretty sure that the kids know wether or not he is as well.

It takes two to tango and to commit sexual assault.
The kids would only know if he's a kiddie fiddler if he is a kiddie fiddler, otherwise they would only know that he didn't fiddle them, not the slew of other kids he could potentially have fiddled. So stating that there are kids out there who know would imply his guilt, and remove the point of the whole excercise in uncertainty. Therefore, the only person who truly knows if he's a kiddie fiddler is Mr. MJ, as he would be the only one who has the knowledge of never having fiddled ANY kid.

Get it?

Citizen
05-16-2007, 04:21 AM
I get exactly what you're saying. Which is why I said "Wether or not he is".

Ya blind bastard. <3

RandomPasserby
05-16-2007, 04:29 AM
Funny thing is that if OJ loses now, any racist can kick him out by using the same reason and as an excuse. So he probably only gave a good excuse to kick him out to all the racists who are in the food industry.

Pierrot le Fou
05-16-2007, 04:33 AM
I get exactly what you're saying. Which is why I said "Wether or not he is".

Ya blind bastard. <3
No, I don't think you do.

I do not know if Michael Jackson molests children. Only Michael Jackson knows of Michael Jackson molests children.

Case (A):
Michael Jackson is a child molestor. Any child molested by Michael Jackson while conscious can state factually that Michael Jackson is a child molestor. However, all children who Michael Jackson have not molested cannot make the same claim based on fact. Michael Jackson can also state factually that he has molested children, because he's done the molesting.

Conclusion: Michael Jackson and the molest child(ren) know

Case (B)
Michael Jackson is not a child molestor. While each child knows that Michael Jackson did not molest them, none can say that he isn't a child molestor universally based on evidence. They can only speak from their own experience, but cannot generalize based on it. Michael Jackson is the only person who can say that he is not a child molestor, since he is the only person who can know that he has never molested any children.

Conclusion: Only Michael Jackson knows

Ergo, if it's case A, then your statement makes sense. If it's case B, then your statement falls short. If I were to use your statement, which would only hold relevance in case A, it would mean that I had already assumed that he was a molestor because I would have selected a sentence which could only be correct if he was in fact a molestor, eliminating the point of going on the evidence and being unsure.

Get it?

Digital Masta
05-16-2007, 04:41 AM
Am I the only one here who thinks that MJ actually is a child molestor?

Well...I'm not saying that he isn't but I will say that in the instances that he was brought up on charges for he wasn't. Based on evidence...especially the second time...that was just a sad display.

Citizen
05-16-2007, 04:55 AM
Get it?

No.

Explain using finger puppets, plz.

Pierrot le Fou
05-16-2007, 05:00 AM
This is Joe: ¶

This is kid 1: ð
This is kid 2: §

|_¶ð_| <--- in bed

|_o¶_| <--- molestation!

The next day...

|_¶§_| <--- in bed

|_¶§_| <--- no molestation

ð: "I was molested by ¶!"
§: "¶ isn't a molestor!"
¶: "I molested ð."

|_¶ð_| <--- in bed

|_¶ð_| <--- no molestation

|_¶§_| <--- in bed

|_¶§_| <--- no molestation

ð: "¶ isn't a molestor!"
§: "¶ isn't a molestor!"
¶: "I am not a molestor"

In order to make them really finger puppets, shove your fingers through the screen to get them on.

Citizen
05-16-2007, 05:02 AM
I should mod you for that.

Pierrot le Fou
05-16-2007, 05:05 AM
I should be modded for a lot of things, but fortunately they don't brand deviants anymore. That went out with the Nazis.

japanat
05-16-2007, 05:59 AM
Only Michael Jackson knows if Michael Jackson molests children.I'm gonna be a glutton for punishment and bite the mixed metaphor...

I would say that "Only Michael Jackson knows if he is not a child molester."

Were he a child molester, at least one other person would know, barring the use of psychotropic drugs, etc. Were he not, only he could know with complete certainty.

Personally, I think he's a fruitcake, whose music and videos I found highly entertaining until around the 'Why Me?' 1990s. But none of the evidence given has been sufficient to prove 'beyond a reasonable doubt' to a jury, and I haven't even seen most of that - only the parts that were leaked to the media.

People talk about him paying off the first kid, but if there were even halfway-sufficient physical evidence at all, the case would have proceeded even without the child's testimony. The DA would not have let go of that one at all.

And OJ? It was a real shame that cop was such a racist, he fucked up a slam-dunk, and turned an open-and-shut trial into a racial circus. Most of the other mistakes, even the shrunken glove, could have been survivable; but a racist cop with irregular evidence guaranteed doubt, as it should have.

phenyl
05-16-2007, 06:04 AM
I should be modded for a lot of things...

With modding, he meant '+5 funny', of course.
In soviet russia...

Pierrot le Fou
05-16-2007, 06:19 AM
not[/I] a child molester."

Were he a child molester, at least one other person would know, barring the use of psychotropic drugs, etc.
Or, y'know, if the kid was asleep, or it was an infant, or...

So I'm sticking with my statement, dammit.

stsparky
05-16-2007, 06:24 AM
Am I the only one here who thinks that MJ actually is a child molestor?
I hope so. Ask me, I went to school with him. He's a loon but I don't think he's had sex with kids. His "Peter Pan" nature makes him the target of extortionists. The first charge - I knew all the parties involved. It was pure extortion. The kid confessed to his peers that his dad forced him to make the claim. To this day I don't know how the stepdad didn't take out a contract on the dad. He had the connections to do so. That the Jackson Family handlers allowed his behavior to give appearance of a 2nd molestation baffles me. But those witnesses shot their credibility in the foot early on in the case.

For the record, the one party we were both at back in 88/89, I saw him with an adult doing 'adult' stuff. I bailed the party soon after to hook up with Too Tall Tina as it wasn't really my scene.

Jetsetlemming
05-16-2007, 09:05 AM
I'd like to be open minded and say he's just weird, but then that whole slumber party thing and having kids sleep in his bed.....
Also, OJ dropped the charges. I think the universal laughter on hearing about the case from normal people MIGHT have helped :P

ParryDat
05-16-2007, 12:18 PM
Am I the only one here who thinks that MJ actually is a child molestor?

Nope.

It's just too coincidental that he is always caught doing shady stuff around little boys.

Radiance
05-16-2007, 12:28 PM
Am I the only one here who thinks that MJ actually is a child molestor?

To be honest, I would lean towards yes he is. However, I will show my equally horrible side and state that even if he is, I seriously don't care. I wouldn't hold it against him. He has contributed more to society than the vast majority of people could ever dream of. One, two, three vices... ah well guess he is human after all.

edit: Man, this statement really makes me look like a horrible person. I would also state that its not like the kids didn't get a lot more out of the situation regardless. Lots of money etc....

Jetsetlemming
05-16-2007, 12:46 PM
What has he contributed to society? Being a pop star? :boggled:

Trump
05-16-2007, 01:17 PM
Wow, somehow we got from OJ to MJ.... why not make the jump to BJ?

Jetsetlemming
05-16-2007, 01:22 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BJ's_Wholesale_Club

koku
05-16-2007, 08:37 PM
Next time, just for you kokujin, I'll end my post with [/sarcasm]
That would make me tear. Awww. :)

Pierrot le Fou
05-16-2007, 11:47 PM
Nope.

It's just too coincidental that he is always caught doing shady stuff around little boys.
If he had all the money in the world (which he does), he wouldn't be caught doing shady stuff around little boys. That's the thing. That's like saying anyone who gets drunk at office parties must be a raging alcoholic, because they get caught drunk whenever there's alcohol around, or that any male coworker smiling and chatting with female coworkers must be screwing half the office.

It ain't based on rationality or fact, but based on preconceived notions of what the truth is, with the facts viewed in a manner to make it seem feasible.

bubbles
05-17-2007, 01:00 AM
Last I heard he was dirt poor (as in the can't afford his elephants kind of poor) and hiding with a harem of young boys in a far-off land...

The molestation stuff aside, I feel sorry for his kids (conspicuously as white as his newest incarnation)

stsparky
05-17-2007, 05:26 AM
If he had all the money in the world (which he does), he wouldn't be caught doing shady stuff around little boys. That's the thing. ...

QFT. But maybe it's did have enough 'Fuck You Money' for awhile.

People with money don't get embarassed like us normal folks. One couldn't say he is the most normal person or the world's best dad - but to make too much out of two clear cases of extortion means you want to validate the worst DA in California for wasting my tax money.

Some people want to believe the worst of others.

Jetsetlemming
05-17-2007, 06:04 AM
QFT. But maybe it's did have enough 'Fuck You Money' for awhile.

People with money don't get embarassed like us normal folks. One couldn't say he is the most normal person or the world's best dad - but to make too much out of two clear cases of extortion means you want to validate the worst DA in California for wasting my tax money.

Some people want to believe the worst of others.
Wasn't OJ's trial held in California? >_>;

stsparky
05-17-2007, 06:33 AM
Wasn't OJ's trial held in California? >_>;
Yeah; but there was an actual double homicide in OJ's case. It was a double nothing in the MJ case and everyone knew it at Justice. Fuckhead D.A. had to play the tough asshole card.

RandomPasserby
05-17-2007, 12:22 PM
Am I the only one here who thinks that MJ actually is a child molestor?
You are guy with a webpage about seeing jhs girls' panties, jhs blowjobs and being anally penetrated by fingers of jhs students. If I was you, I wouldn't go down the "What he does with children is suspicious, so he must be a molestor!"-road :P

Decade
05-17-2007, 09:04 PM
I hope so. Ask me, I went to school with him. He's a loon but I don't think he's had sex with kids. His "Peter Pan" nature makes him the target of extortionists. The first charge - I knew all the parties involved. It was pure extortion. The kid confessed to his peers that his dad forced him to make the claim. To this day I don't know how the stepdad didn't take out a contract on the dad. He had the connections to do so. That the Jackson Family handlers allowed his behavior to give appearance of a 2nd molestation baffles me. But those witnesses shot their credibility in the foot early on in the case.

For the record, the one party we were both at back in 88/89, I saw him with an adult doing 'adult' stuff. I bailed the party soon after to hook up with Too Tall Tina as it wasn't really my scene.

Im gonna try and finish this story:

You had a another threesome sometime afterwards.


...you know, could you spare just a LITTLE luck here with me? You're hogging all of it. :gloomy:

ミュー
05-17-2007, 11:00 PM
They're going to need the resurrection of Mr. Johnny Cochran to win again.

I can hear it now,
"Even the placemats is white, so this place must be racist!!"

Roxie
05-17-2007, 11:41 PM
eh, that doesn't rhyme so well.

Jetsetlemming
05-17-2007, 11:43 PM
And the case is dropped. I'm sure Cochran's absense was a key factor in OJ's decision. :P

Pierrot le Fou
05-17-2007, 11:54 PM
If they won't let him sit,
They must be bigots

(you have to say 'bigot' like 'biggit', but I think Johnnie could pull that off)

stsparky
05-18-2007, 06:05 AM
Im gonna try and finish this story: You had a another threesome sometime afterwards. ...you know, could you spare just a LITTLE luck here with me? You're hogging all of it. :gloomy:

17/18 years ago? Let's just say MJ's thing isn't my cup of tea. I had two steady girlfriends (Too Tall and her polar opposite) then and the romance in Sapporo. But I was pretty discreet. Oddly enough 1988 was the year with the two noviates. 1993 was the next time the stars aligned correctly. But it happens. And it will happen to you if you open your mind to it.

Chuckles
05-18-2007, 06:09 AM
If they won't let him sit,
They must be bigots

(you have to say 'bigot' like 'biggit', but I think Johnnie could pull that off)

Lemme try...


If he can't come in, must be his skin!

Or something to that effect >_> Or maybe "If he can't sit down, it's 'cause he's brown!" <_<