Kustom
09-14-2005, 11:27 AM
In the spirit of Pooka's threads, here's another topic so that we can rip each other's throats ;)
From wikipedia:
Euthanasia (Greek: ευθανασία, "good death") is the practice of killing a person or animal, in a painless or minimally painful way, for merciful reasons, usually to end their suffering.
Euthanasia in the strict sense involves actively causing death (active euthanasia). This is in some cases legal in the Netherlands and Belgium, but in no other countries (as of 2005). Euthanasia in a wider sense includes assisting sufferers to commit suicide, in particular physician-assisted suicide; this is legal in a small number of jurisdictions.
Allowing death—e.g. by not providing life support or vital medication—is not considered euthanasia if it is the patient's wish. It is sometimes called passive euthanasia in cases where the patient is unable to make decisions about treatment.
What do you think about euthanasia?
Cases in which people could justify euthanasia I can think of:
- Severe pain that won't go away
- Severe brain damage putting the person in "vegetable" state
- Disability that prevent the person from doing anything/the things she lives for (like in a recent award winning film I don't wanna spoil)
- Coma with little chances of waking up
- Assisted suicide for whatever reason
Of course, not all of those cases are equal and it's possible to agree with euthanasia in some cases and not others.
Personally, I'm leaning against euthanasia not for philosophical reasons but more for practical reasons.
I see a real danger that people could murder family members or patients and claim they just "put them out of their misery"... It actually happened in France a few years back, a nurse murdered half a dozen old people under her watch and then claimed that she had only been merciful to avoid being charged. It turned out she was just raving mad, and she had also forged documents to claim a share of her victims' money.
Things are different if the patient is able to give his written consent, but there could be situations in which the family put pressure on him. I think allowing the family itself to take the decision is a slippery slope: what if a rich old fart falls into a coma, and his 20 something beautiful bride has to take the decision, mmm? I wonder what choice she'd make...
Finally, denying euthanasia does not deny you the right to die, it just postpones it. You're gonna die anyway... Only in case of severe pain is postponing death really a problem. And even in that case you don't know what's after death, it could be even more painful!
Those are my 2 cents, but I haven't really made up my mind yet. What do you think?
From wikipedia:
Euthanasia (Greek: ευθανασία, "good death") is the practice of killing a person or animal, in a painless or minimally painful way, for merciful reasons, usually to end their suffering.
Euthanasia in the strict sense involves actively causing death (active euthanasia). This is in some cases legal in the Netherlands and Belgium, but in no other countries (as of 2005). Euthanasia in a wider sense includes assisting sufferers to commit suicide, in particular physician-assisted suicide; this is legal in a small number of jurisdictions.
Allowing death—e.g. by not providing life support or vital medication—is not considered euthanasia if it is the patient's wish. It is sometimes called passive euthanasia in cases where the patient is unable to make decisions about treatment.
What do you think about euthanasia?
Cases in which people could justify euthanasia I can think of:
- Severe pain that won't go away
- Severe brain damage putting the person in "vegetable" state
- Disability that prevent the person from doing anything/the things she lives for (like in a recent award winning film I don't wanna spoil)
- Coma with little chances of waking up
- Assisted suicide for whatever reason
Of course, not all of those cases are equal and it's possible to agree with euthanasia in some cases and not others.
Personally, I'm leaning against euthanasia not for philosophical reasons but more for practical reasons.
I see a real danger that people could murder family members or patients and claim they just "put them out of their misery"... It actually happened in France a few years back, a nurse murdered half a dozen old people under her watch and then claimed that she had only been merciful to avoid being charged. It turned out she was just raving mad, and she had also forged documents to claim a share of her victims' money.
Things are different if the patient is able to give his written consent, but there could be situations in which the family put pressure on him. I think allowing the family itself to take the decision is a slippery slope: what if a rich old fart falls into a coma, and his 20 something beautiful bride has to take the decision, mmm? I wonder what choice she'd make...
Finally, denying euthanasia does not deny you the right to die, it just postpones it. You're gonna die anyway... Only in case of severe pain is postponing death really a problem. And even in that case you don't know what's after death, it could be even more painful!
Those are my 2 cents, but I haven't really made up my mind yet. What do you think?