Chinpokomon
07-04-2006, 01:51 AM
So, I was browsing the English language version of asahi's website, and came across this article:
http://www.asahi.com/english/Herald-asahi/TKY200607030132.html
In summary, it talks about a Japanese woman who did a bunch of interviews with people in countries occupied by Japan during the war who had their lives destroyed because of medical expenses from accidentally setting off abandoned bombs, or other similarly unfortunate events.
I was thinking "Wow, so there is some awareness and feeling of responsibility for acts committed during the war, and the aftermath"
However...
I can't find a Japanese version of this article.:eyepop:
Now, I don't want to jump to any conclusions.. Perhaps I'm just not searching well enough (definitely a possiblity)
However, if this article truly doesn't exist on asahi in Japanese, the question is:
1) Is this simply an oversight? Perhaps this is a weekly column that never runs in Japanese, and only this week it happens to cover the effects of the Japanese occupation? or....
2) There was an editorial decision made that this was too sensitive a topic to have an article in Japanese on.
I suppose I shouldn't be suprised by either. :gloomy:
Here's to hoping my Japanese sucks and I just couldn't find the corresponding article...
http://www.asahi.com/english/Herald-asahi/TKY200607030132.html
In summary, it talks about a Japanese woman who did a bunch of interviews with people in countries occupied by Japan during the war who had their lives destroyed because of medical expenses from accidentally setting off abandoned bombs, or other similarly unfortunate events.
I was thinking "Wow, so there is some awareness and feeling of responsibility for acts committed during the war, and the aftermath"
However...
I can't find a Japanese version of this article.:eyepop:
Now, I don't want to jump to any conclusions.. Perhaps I'm just not searching well enough (definitely a possiblity)
However, if this article truly doesn't exist on asahi in Japanese, the question is:
1) Is this simply an oversight? Perhaps this is a weekly column that never runs in Japanese, and only this week it happens to cover the effects of the Japanese occupation? or....
2) There was an editorial decision made that this was too sensitive a topic to have an article in Japanese on.
I suppose I shouldn't be suprised by either. :gloomy:
Here's to hoping my Japanese sucks and I just couldn't find the corresponding article...