Outpost 9

[eyez0nme]

People of Outpost 9, this thread should be closed. Since I did not put any opinions, but a fact: It's alright to have an opinion posing as a question, but not alright to type what you know is a 100% true, without questioning it. Do you see how faulty your system is?

90 percent of the threads I created are from different message boards, written by different user members, on different sites, in the course of three years; and I only copy and paste, bringing all these thoughts to a single table, provided here. So what does that tell about you? What does that tell you, about yourself and your hatred against the threads I create, when it is these same threads that were created by your fellow members in another boards. All controversial topics that were debated in the general consensus. You don't hate me; you hate yourself.

On other words: You hate yourself more than you hate me. I can prove this with future threads, I randomly select.

[CNagy]

People of Outpost 9, it seems Eyez0nme is an advanced regurgitation machine, spouting topics that it has collected from all across the internets. Unfortunately, someone attached a set of balls to this machine and it seems to need to prove itself. Too bad they didn't add advanced rational thought to its list of capabilities.

Eyez0nme, let me present you with an alternative to your faulty "We hate ourselves" theory. We, as a community, do not need someone who is the equivalent of a Mike Myers Saturday Night Live skit ("Sweetmeats are neither sweet, nor meat. Discuss.") We dislike you not because you make pointless topics, but because you make a topic pointless when you try to act as some sort of content moderator of a debate. If you have something to say, say it. If you have nothing to say on a topic, leave the New Thread button alone.

What you do, on the internet, will generally be taken a certain way based on your reputation. Members that have the respect of the community can do things and it will be seen one way, while someone else can do it and it will have a negative connotation.

Thus we come to you, O Mighty Topic Search Engine. Most posting around here is reactive. You post an opinion, someone posts either a supporting or counter opinion. Repeat ad nauseum. Not typing an opinion in a thread that you create makes it feel as if you: a) have no opinion, b) see yourself as the aforementioned content moderator (which is a little pretentious,) or c) are attempting to be seen as an intellectual by introducing interesting debate topics, but do not actually have the goods to write up a thoughtful post about it.

Oh, then there is the fact that you'll post a handful of these threads at once, making the importance of any one thread dwindle in the minds of others. So yeah, input that into your database and churn out a great one-line topic question at whatever forum is next in your cycle.

[NERD]

People of Outpost 9, it seems Eyez0nme is an advanced regurgitation machine, spouting topics that it has collected from all across the internets. Unfortunately, someone attached a set of balls to this machine and it seems to need to prove itself. Too bad they didn't add advanced rational thought to its list of capabilities.

Eyez0nme, let me present you with an alternative to your faulty "We hate ourselves" theory. We, as a community, do not need someone who is the equivalent of a Mike Myers Saturday Night Live skit ("Sweetmeats are neither sweet, nor meat. Discuss.") We dislike you not because you make pointless topics, but because you make a topic pointless when you try to act as some sort of content moderator of a debate. If you have something to say, say it. If you have nothing to say on a topic, leave the New Thread button alone.

What you do, on the internet, will generally be taken a certain way based on your reputation. Members that have the respect of the community can do things and it will be seen one way, while someone else can do it and it will have a negative connotation.

Thus we come to you, O Mighty Topic Search Engine. Most posting around here is reactive. You post an opinion, someone posts either a supporting or counter opinion. Repeat ad nauseum. Not typing an opinion in a thread that you create makes it feel as if you: a) have no opinion, b) see yourself as the aforementioned content moderator (which is a little pretentious,) or c) are attempting to be seen as an intellectual by introducing interesting debate topics, but do not actually have the goods to write up a thoughtful post about it.

Oh, then there is the fact that you'll post a handful of these threads at once, making the importance of any one thread dwindle in the minds of others. So yeah, input that into your database and churn out a great one-line topic question at whatever forum is next in your cycle.

Hear hear.

[Jon885]

so wait a minute..you're too unoriginal to come up with your own topics so you have to copy from others? i don't want you banned but you're anything but intriguing if that's what you do.

[PopCulturePooka]

The annoying thing with you Eyezonme was when you were posting 5, 6 or 7 shitty and stupid articles a day and cluttering the forum with abosulute nonsense.

You were nothing more than a spammer.

You have cut down a lot now and I'm not sure I'm comfortable with closing all your threads just because you started it, especially if it does provoke some actual discussion. It's starting to smell on a mod having a personal vendetta.


You just need a whole lot more discretion about what you post, where you post it and what volume you post.

[Psychochink]

What I'd like to see is probably outside the mods' power (although it may be within Az'). eyez0nme has built up a (deserved) reputation as a troll. Is it possible to just take away thread-starting privileges (at least in GD) without banning entirely, until such time as there's some kind of proof that he/she is capable of actually contributing to the discussion around here instead of spewing garbage just to get a response?

[kyaa the catlord]

This is the part of Sprockets when we dance.

[Jay]

People of Outpost 9, this thread should be closed. Since I did not put any opinions, but a fact: It's alright to have an opinion posing as a question, but not alright to type what you know is a 100% true, without questioning it. Do you see how faulty your system is?

I'm more interested in how we got from here...

90 percent of the threads I created are from different message boards, written by different user members, on different sites, in the course of three years; and I only copy and paste, bringing all these thoughts to a single table, provided here. So what does that tell about you? What does that tell you, about yourself and your hatred against the threads I create, when it is these same threads that were created by your fellow members in another boards. All controversial topics that were debated in the general consensus. You don't hate me; you hate yourself.

On other words: You hate yourself more than you hate me. I can prove this with future threads, I randomly select.

...to here.

So because you post a bunch of 'contraversial' threads all the time without any supporting or otherwise opinion that basically amounts to spamming, we hate OURSELVES? That what you're trying to say?

"I can prove this with future threads, I randomly select."

By all means, go ahead and prove this theory of yours. I'd LOVE to see what exactly it is that makes me hate myself without even knowing it.

[Dead Sexy Vocab]

Funny how everyone wanted to vote you off. :p

But eah, I think these guys are just telling you to tone down the "copy from one intenets site, paste it in here" sort-of thing. Hell, I have no problems with you as much, but a couple of your posts have been out of hand and uncanny.

[Collapse]

Poll says 13-0.

Bitch please.

[Jay]

Now it's 15-0. Think the guy should take a hint?

[Dead Sexy Vocab]

Bitch, please!

[karob]

Eyez0nme since googlenews was invented we don't need you.
Really though I have another 4 weeks of pure unregulated internet surfing and this drama gives me something to think about... so here is one person who appreciates(in a very small way) that you are an ass. Cheers!

p.s. I voted to ban you.

[Jay]

Shit. Knew I should've got a screenshot of that poll when it was at 0 votes for no. :(

[jindojim]

It's not the fact that the articles aren't interesting but you seem to just throw them out there without steering the discussion in any direction. I don't recall seeing you ever show any genuine interest in your threads, and in your few responses, you comment with something completely out of line. Not only that, but you don't seem to say anything in other people's threads. And now you just admitted that you're just regurgitating stuff from other forums. Well, at least some were amusing reads though, like the one about the guy finding out he dated his mom.

I'd say the Colloseum seems to be in favor of your termination.

[Praetorian]

I voted "no". As long as, from now on, you make comments of yourself below your post to steer the discussion to some direction.

[MeneerDijk]

People of Outpost 9, this thread should be closed. Since I did not put any opinions, but a fact: It's alright to have an opinion posing as a question, but not alright to type what you know is a 100% true, without questioning it. Do you see how faulty your system is?

YEs this thread should be closed, not because

90 percent of the threads I created are from different message boards, written by different user members, on different sites, in the course of three years; and I only copy and paste, bringing all these thoughts to a single table, provided here. So what does that tell about you? What does that tell you, about yourself and your hatred against the threads I create, when it is these same threads that were created by your fellow members in another boards. All controversial topics that were debated in the general consensus. You don't hate me; you hate yourself.
On other words: You hate yourself more than you hate me. I can prove this with future threads, I randomly select.


Dear Eyez0nme, we have our own rules on this forum, what is ok on another forum isn't necisarrily ok here. If smoking weed is legal in Holland is it legal in other places? no!

We (the mods and other users) have sent you multiple pm's and asked you several times to stop creating threads that do not kick off a discussion. The only thing you do is copy and paste some article....and thats it! no question, no dilemma, nothing that would kick off a discussion. These kind of threads do not belong in the DISCUSSION forum. These threads only create clutter, they are short lived and have no direction whatsoever. The fact that you create this thread tells me that you aren't interested in discussion at all, you just like the attention, you want all eyes on you.

We have tried multiple times to reason with you, but you ignore the requests from others... and now you say that you are proving some point (an invalid point nonetheless)

Now have some character and shape up. I left this thread open to give you a chance to reply, but i very much doubt you will, since you have never replied to a single pm.

p.s. Plagiarism is a crime, btw.

[Kass]

eyezonme, the vast majority of your threads are NOT closed. Several were merely moved to other forums. Get your facts (you know things that are true) straight. Percentage wise, very few of your threads have been closed.

Get over yourself. Quit spamming. Quit throwing links up without any discussion. Quit stealing other people's writings.

Now, Meenerdjik left this open because he's a nice guy taking a beating about closing a thread or two. I, on the other hand, see no reason to allow a thread to continue where the sole point is for you to criticize the board members who don't like you and for the board members who don't like you to criticize you. This isn't a popularity contest and the membership doesn't decide who gets to post here and who doesn't. That would be Azrael's privilege.

Say goodnight thread.

Goodnight thread.