PDA

View Full Version : Drunk minor killed her friend -- let off the hook.


Fermented Yeast Paste
01-26-2008, 04:15 PM
Hey Roxie, looks like I'm taking your place for once!

Two cars collided last year on Cinco de Mayo.

Considering the date, you might assume that at least one of the drivers was drunk — and you'd be right. Laura Varker was 17 years old, and she'd been tubing down the Salt River all day with her eight best girlfriends. Their T-shirts all read "Cinco de Drinko." Even an hour after the accident, Varker's blood-alcohol level was 0.09, over the legal limit for adults. And, as an underage driver, she was in violation of the law by having any amount of alcohol in her system.

One of Varker's girlfriends, 15-year-old Felicia Edwards, didn't drink a drop. But it was Edwards who died when Varker's Yukon Denali hit another car and flipped over and over like a tumbleweed before coming to a horrifying stop on the Bush Highway north of Mesa. Edwards was thrown from the SUV and pronounced dead at the scene.

When sheriff's deputies called Felicia's mother that terrible day, her first question was, "Was she wearing a seat belt?" She wasn't. Instead, Felicia had been in the back of the SUV holding down the tubes — a decision she paid for with her life.

That's a tragedy.

But only in its aftermath did the collision become a travesty. That's because, even after blood tests showed that Varker was legally drunk, and even after sheriff's investigators learned that it was she and another girl who'd flashed a fake ID and bought Coors Light and malt liquor for the group, Varker hasn't been charged with anything.

Not underage consumption.

Not drunken driving.

And certainly not manslaughter.

Instead of charging the affluent white girl, the sheriff's officers arrested the other driver, a black man, a guy who wasn't even legally drunk.

Bryant Wilkerson was a 28-year-old postal service clerk with nothing on his record worse than a fender-bender. That day, he was merely making a U-turn, in a place where U-turns are permitted, when a 17-year-old party girl in her daddy's SUV tried to speed around him.

Wilkerson's life has been upended. He's been charged with nine felony counts, including manslaughter and aggravated assault. He spent three months in jail because he didn't have the money to post bail, and he lost his job because of that. Now under strict curfew and random alcohol and drug screenings for the past five months, he has to get permission from the court just to attend his daughter's band concerts in the evening.

He's facing 21 years in prison.

Meanwhile, Laura Varker is posing on her MySpace page in a bikini.

That day on the Bush Highway, Bryant Wilkerson did one thing wrong. Admittedly, it was really wrong.

He was making a U-turn — which, again, was legal — when he saw Varker's Denali come out of nowhere on his left side. According to the sheriff's report, witnesses suggest Varker saw his little Hyundai slowing and crossed over the yellow lines into the center lane to pass him. At least one witness, a friend of Varker's who was just behind her on the highway, told deputies that the other car was slowing too dramatically for her to stop; Varker had to lurch into the center lane just to avoid rear-ending him.

(Now, you'd think Varker would allow plenty of distance between herself and other drivers. Just seven months earlier, as a 16-year-old with a brand-new license, Varker had caused another accident. Police records say she failed to stop in time and slammed into another car on Cactus Road, which then hit the car in front of it.)

But back to Cinco de Mayo. As he went into the turn, Wilkerson didn't see the SUV veering into the center lane until it was too late.

Amazingly, Wilkerson's Hyundai was just fine, other than losing its bumper. It grazed the SUV and hung on to finish the U-turn.

In their rear-view window, though, Wilkerson's passengers were horrified to see the Denali flipping over and over, according to the sheriff's report.

And that's when, Wilkerson admits, he made a really big mistake. He panicked and took off.

"I freaked out," he says. "That's no excuse; that's so not me. But I had the people in my car yelling, 'Go, go, go!' and I just freaked out and panicked." Sheriff's deputies caught up with him just 10 minutes later.

Because he fled the scene, it's understandable that the sheriff's deputies assumed that Wilkerson had something to hide. Their reports note that he smelled heavily of alcohol, that he'd admitted to smoking pot that morning, that he seemed drunk.

The problem is, all the tests came back well under the legal limit. Wilkerson blew a 0.049 on the sheriff's Breathalyzer. By the time the sheriff's officers did a blood test, which is widely considered much more accurate, Wilkerson's blood-alcohol content was only 0.01. The presence of marijuana was just as minimal. Wilkerson had only trace amounts in his bloodstream.

Never mind. The sheriff's deputies had made up their minds: Wilkerson was to blame for the crash. They arrested him, charging him with manslaughter, aggravated assault, leaving the scene of a fatal injury accident, unlawful flight from law enforcement, and five counts of endangerment. (A sheriff's spokesman did not respond to a request for comment.)

He would spend the next three months in Maricopa County's Fourth Avenue Jail — in the maximum-security wing. His wife tried her best to raise bail, but $54,000 is a lot of collateral when you're a renter.

Wilkerson learned in jail that the SUV driver had been legally drunk. He'd initially been so shocked by the accident, he says, that he figured he must be to blame.

But when he heard that, he began to wonder just what was going on. He had only a public defender and no money for a lawyer. He questioned whether he was getting a fair shake.

Wilkerson contacted the Reverend Oscar Tillman, president of the NAACP's Maricopa County branch, who had much the same reaction. Tillman couldn't believe what he was hearing.

The article continues on after that. http://phoenixnewtimes.com/2008-01-24/news/the-wrong-driver/1

Then again, this also happened in the same Maricopa County that let deputies off the hook after they torched the wrong house and let the dog inside burn to death. I don't hold their law enforcement in the highest regard.

Chuckles
01-26-2008, 04:36 PM
Wow.

Vic_Rattlehead
01-26-2008, 04:37 PM
I do not like this style of journalism. Where is this from btw?

Fermented Yeast Paste
01-26-2008, 04:42 PM
I do not like this style of journalism. Where is this from btw?
Holy crap, I thought I linked to it in the OP. I'll edit it in, sorry.

Chris
01-26-2008, 05:33 PM
Yeah, that article was incredibly biased, it muddled the description of the man's U-turn.
I don't that he deserves nine felony counts, but then again, he did leave the scene, and if someone is injured that might as well be counted as "leaving them to die," from the other side's point of view.

Pretty sickening that the girl hasn't gotten charged at all though. People don't take enough time to teach these newer drivers the true killing power that a car, especially a SUV (though they neglected to mention what kind, and there are many different sizes) of any kind has.

DizBukHaPeter
01-26-2008, 05:45 PM
The SUV she was driving was stated in the article as GMC yukon denali, basically your standard 1/2 ton pickup.

Chris
01-26-2008, 11:18 PM
Ah, I remember reading Denali, but I haven't heard of that model.
I looked it up on google images, pretty sad that her parents put her in charge of a vehicle that big at 17 years of age.

haterllnation
01-27-2008, 03:14 AM
Ah, I remember reading Denali, but I haven't heard of that model.
I looked it up on google images, pretty sad that her parents put her in charge of a vehicle that big at 17 years of age.


Most adults cannot handle that size a vehicle, let alone a teen. :bang:

Hmm, I think the guy should be brought up on charges of fleeing the scene of an accident and the likes. However, as most probably agree, this girl should be charged with operating vehicle under the influence and manslaughter charges.

Also note, seatbelts may save lives. What is more important, the tubes or your life? :watson:

ellie
01-27-2008, 03:59 AM
I also feel like that article was heavily biased. I rather read non-biased journalism, and make up my own mind about the events--instead of having the journalist forcibly try to tell me exactly what I should be thinking.

I think the guy should be charged, but certainly not on all of the counts he has been charged with! It sounds like he should be charged with a hit-and-run, since he fled the scene of the accident. He also could get a DUI--even if you're below the legal limit, you can still be charged if you appear drunk.

HOWEVER. . .the girl driving should be charged with a DUI, underage drinking, felony counts of having a fake ID, providing alcohol for minors, aiding and abetting minors in committing a crime (underage drinking), endangerment, possibly manslaughter. I am REALLY surprised she did not have her license immediately revoked.

I wonder how guilty that girl feels now, or if she lives in an entitled bubble in which she believes herself to somehow be a victim in all this?

Chuckles
01-27-2008, 04:34 AM
The guy should get leaving the scene of an accident... pretty much it.

japanat
01-27-2008, 06:35 AM
I don't know if Arizona has the difference, but he should get a DWI, not a DUI. In states which make the distinction, DWI (Driving While Impaired) is half the blood-alcohol level of DUI. And reeking of alcohol, while definitely grounds for a stop and for a blood test, doesn't replace the blood test. The blood test says no DUI, so he can beat that. Sounds to me like the cops are just adding on charges to force him to plea bargain, since he can't afford a good lawyer.

The girl sounds like a mini-Paris Hilton, though. She also should get reckless driving charges added onto the list, since it is always the responsibility of the following car to avoid the car in front. Even if the driver in front stands on his breaks, the car behind is at fault if they strike the lead car.

stsparky
01-27-2008, 11:14 AM
Reminds me of the current first lady. Same deal. Killed a boyfriend when she was 17.

Roxie
01-27-2008, 03:08 PM
Yeah, I don't like the the very obvious heavy ass bias in the article, but WOW. That's some indefensible stuff going on.

Oh and ha-ha ;)

erbiumfiber
01-27-2008, 11:56 PM
Even if the driver in front stands on his breaks, the car behind is at fault if they strike the lead car.


Yeah, the only accident of my LIFE was in a right-hand turn and the minibus in front of me (something like a rental car bus) SLAMMED on its brakes. One of the passengers went to the police and said the driver did not know how to drive and was continually mixing up the brake and the gas pedal. I think he was using two feet (left for brake, right for gas).

So I didn't get a ticket AND somehow the accident was not held against me by my insurance company because the other driver did not have a commercial license or whatever kind of license he needed to drive his beast.

But, normally, I would have been screwed. And, when you're in a turn (and this was a green light, not right-on-red) you do get a bit closer to the car in front than in normal driving.

The driver was an immigrant from somewhere in the Middle East and kept insinuating to the cop that I couldn't drive because I am a woman and that they men-folk knew how this was. Didn't go over too well with the police. He was also getting all hyper- this was a fender-bender, no injuries- and the cop told him to keep a lid on it.
___________

I can't understand the road in this article. Is there a center lane that is a turn lane? If so, what the hell was she doing driving in the turn lane? That's not for through-traffic. Seems like another violation for her. And if the center lane wasn't a turn lane, then why was he making a U-turn from the right lane? I think I need a diagram...