PDA

View Full Version : Another (more promising) theory of everything


Kwiz
12-03-2007, 12:30 AM
Surfer dude stuns physicists with theory of everything

An impoverished surfer has drawn up a new theory of the universe, seen by some as the Holy Grail of physics, which has received rave reviews from scientists.

Garrett Lisi, 39, has a doctorate but no university affiliation and spends most of the year surfing in Hawaii, where he has also been a hiking guide and bridge builder (when he slept in a jungle yurt).

The E8 pattern (click to enlarge), Garrett Lisi surfing (middle) and out of the water (right)

In winter, he heads to the mountains near Lake Tahoe, Nevada, where he snowboards. "Being poor sucks," Lisi says. "It's hard to figure out the secrets of the universe when you're trying to figure out where you and your girlfriend are going to sleep next month."

Despite this unusual career path, his proposal is remarkable because, by the arcane standards of particle physics, it does not require highly complex mathematics.

Even better, it does not require more than one dimension of time and three of space, when some rival theories need ten or even more spatial dimensions and other bizarre concepts. And it may even be possible to test his theory, which predicts a host of new particles, perhaps even using the new Large Hadron Collider atom smasher that will go into action near Geneva next year.

Although the work of 39 year old Garrett Lisi still has a way to go to convince the establishment, let alone match the achievements of Albert Einstein, the two do have one thing in common: Einstein also began his great adventure in theoretical physics while outside the mainstream scientific establishment, working as a patent officer, though failed to achieve the Holy Grail, an overarching explanation to unite all the particles and forces of the cosmos.
advertisement

Now Lisi, currently in Nevada, has come up with a proposal to do this. Lee Smolin at the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, describes Lisi's work as "fabulous". "It is one of the most compelling unification models I've seen in many, many years," he says.

"Although he cultivates a bit of a surfer-guy image its clear he has put enormous effort and time into working the complexities of this structure out over several years," Prof Smolin tells The Telegraph.

"Some incredibly beautiful stuff falls out of Lisi's theory," adds David Ritz Finkelstein at the Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta. "This must be more than coincidence and he really is touching on something profound."

The new theory reported today in New Scientist has been laid out in an online paper entitled "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" by Lisi, who completed his doctorate in theoretical physics in 1999 at the University of California, San Diego.

He has high hopes that his new theory could provide what he says is a "radical new explanation" for the three decade old Standard Model, which weaves together three of the four fundamental forces of nature: the electromagnetic force; the strong force, which binds quarks together in atomic nuclei; and the weak force, which controls radioactive decay.

The reason for the excitement is that Lisi's model also takes account of gravity, a force that has only successfully been included by a rival and highly fashionable idea called string theory, one that proposes particles are made up of minute strings, which is highly complex and elegant but has lacked predictions by which to do experiments to see if it works.

But some are taking a cooler view. [... full article (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/core/Content/displayPrintable.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/11/14/scisurf114.xml&site=30&page=0)]

(insert grumble about coming back and finding that nobody had posted this yet)

This is yet another reason to look forward to the Large Hadron Collider being fired for the first time next spring. What's so refreshing about Lisi's theory is that it's on the way to making testable predictions... quite unlike string theory.

Random
12-03-2007, 12:47 AM
It's also been getting a lot of abuse from scientists, since it doesn't really predict anything new and any calculations to work out masses of particles are so complicated you may as well not bother to undertake them.

Kwiz
12-03-2007, 01:17 AM
True, but we have to keep in mind that every candidate TOE has had its virulent critics. What's refreshing about this one is that it rests on recently solved higher-dimensional geometry, not some dubiously complex concepts like what string theory puts forth.

Random
12-03-2007, 01:20 AM
True, and of course we can't say which is right or righter at the moment, but the E8 geometry isn't much simpler than the 10 dimensions put forward by string theory.

Plekto
12-03-2007, 10:32 PM
There are a small group of people though that believe that the entire problem lies in the splitting off into two areas - Newtonian Physics(macro) and Sub-Atomic(micro) Physics. They spend forever trying to make a unified theory when the solution is actually very simple(at least the premise is - solving the equations/rules is horrendously hard, perhaps beyond our ability to do so).

One of the two is just wrong and has to be somehow converted to the other's system.

Einstein may have come up with a great way of explaining things, but it's just as likely that it's a kludge for a very complex expression of Newtonian Physics. Or vice-versa - maybe Newton was the kludge - far, far too simple. It just looks like it works on the surface.

edit: of course, this could very well lead to silly situations like f = ma being a 6 page long wad of cryptic symbols which no normal human could memorize.

Noel
12-06-2007, 01:18 PM
It sounds really great, I hope it's true.

New Scientist's article explains the theory itself more. Check out the example with G2. Kaleidoscopic video is pretty cool also.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12891-is-mathematical-pattern-the-theory-of-everything.html

The paper itself you can download from http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.0770 (downloads on right of page). By section 1.1 it is already way over my head. :D